Stairs can be a tough task for seasoned designers and are an aspect many homeowners have difficulty understanding. This post will attempt to establish some basic parameters and items to consider when planning a new house or an addition/remodel.
Stairs in commercial/public buildings have more rigorous rules than stairs in houses. In a house, the dimensional requirements for handrails, riser height and tread depth are relaxed somewhat to allow the stair to occupy less space while remaining safe to navigate and climb.
Architectural Record Magazine has for decades now selected its ten best houses on the planet in the annual Record Houses issue. Reading through these in the '80s and '90s, one was awestruck at how many of the winning designs featured stairs that appeared to not comply, for one, two or multiple noted reasons. In the most extreme example, a stair connecting a main and upper level consisted solely of 2" x 11" x 3 ft monolithic slab treads protruding from a side wall, without risers and with no railings of any sort. One wondered how on earth such stairs passed inspection and how their designers could sleep without picturing a two year old teetering at the upper landing area above a 10 or 12 foot drop-off. In recent years the trend has fallen off a bit, and the stairs in Record Houses generally appear safer.
Cultural differences might account for these stairs? One can notice, in photos of places outside the U.S. that it's pretty common that guardrails have much greater than 4" spaces, and they may be lower than we'd require them to be, or sometimes omitted altogether. One photo in an architectural magazine showed a group of people sitting on a rooftop deck in Amsterdam, 2-1/2 stories above the sidewalk. There was built-in seating, a fire pit and hot tub; and there were thin posts at about 6 ft spacing/about 2 ft inboard of the edge, but no guardrail or anything else to keep people from falling off. Part of growing up is learning to recognize and manage risk, and ideas differ on the best way to ingrain that in children. We might be too overprotective in some ways?
Protection for people of all ages can be enhanced by effective placement of stairs. Exterior stairs are magnificent in many locations. Outside of Los Angeles there are streets built in canyons where the houses are elevated well above the street but relatively close to it, and exterior stairs [tile on concrete steps with solid stucco guardrails, or something functionally similar] are a nice welcoming gesture and functional way to reach the front door from the street. In Southcentral Alaska, and anyplace else where there's winter weather for months at a time exterior stairs should be avoided wherever possible. The grandest exterior stair in Anchorage, at the Loussac Library was finally closed and demolished this year, after 30 years of struggling with its maintenance and safety issues.
In the neighborhood where FRamE is located there are four or five builder spec houses built in the early 2000s that are similar to 1970s split-levels, but instead of the lower floor being a half-down basement, these houses have two full stories above a crawl space. The front entrance is still spotted at a mid-level between floors -- so, even though doors could have been placed anywhere on the First Floor and would come out 18 inches above grade, there are none -- and to get into the First Floor, one has to first mount an exterior stair [with 9 or 10 steps, not covered by a roof] and then descend half a flight inside the house down into the lower level. Ridiculous, and never should have been built that way in the first place. These houses would be easy to remodel. In other cases it's much more challenging.
Note that, even at ground level if there is a crawl space, and the floor framing is platformed on the top of the foundation walls there will still be 18 inches or so, minimum from the floor of the house down to grade. Plan to leave room for the porch and a couple of steps, and provide for a roof cover over them. In larger houses, or when conditions allow it can be effective for an area inside the front door to be a couple of steps lower than the surrounding floor area, and especially if the front door is oriented facing a prevailing wind direction. In the winter the depressed entry floor can function as a cold sink and the rest of the house will be less affected by cold air rushing in when people are coming and going. [It really works!]
Now that the entry placement is addressed and exterior stairs eliminated, let's consider how stairs fit inside the house. The common mistake of homeowners and novice designers is to not consider the stairs early in the thought process. Stairs connect to hallways and spill out into larger areas and are part of the circulation path through the house. The smaller the house, the more it benefits by a tight circulation pattern that minimizes the need to pass through intervening rooms on the way to others. Thus, it often makes sense that the stair is centrally located and not pushed to one end or the other. Whether or not the stair is right inside the entry is often an issue of preference. If you're entering at a floor level and not at a split entry, the stairs don't need to be in close proximity, and it might be better to tuck them in elsewhere.
In some circumstances a stair can be a feature, and include widened landings, lots of glass and other design features that take in territorial views or other special aspects of the site/setting. If the house is large enough, and depending on site characteristics two stairs can be placed instead of one. It's always nice to have options, and it can make the space feel more expansive and open than it would otherwise be, and even prepare for a future conversion such as adding a rental apartment within the house.
The stair type that is used most of the time is a switchback stair. It is the least dangerous, and best reconciliation of utility and compactness. It is typically installed so its upper and lower landings are in a convening hallway, thus subtracting three feet or more of length. The mid-level [switchback] landing is usually the full width of both runs [including center wall, if used] combined, making it easy to move beds and large furniture items [compared to other stair types such as L-shaped, winding, spiral]. Since there's two runs it's not possible to fall down a full flight, as it would be on a straight single run. The switchback stair is usually placed between two rooms, with the mid-landing against an exterior wall. It can be placed in the corner [two sides on an exterior wall] -- if this is the case, better to have the upper run of stairs outboard, so the exterior wall height is lessened in case it is a structural issue [wind load resistance].
If there's a drawback to a switchback stair, it is what to do with the leftover space underneath. Most often, it becomes a closet, and not a very useful one since the tallest part must be left unencumbered for access to the lower areas at the back. It might be possible for the upper run to protrude into adjacent room/space and not be enclosed?
The tri-level is a suburban tract house variation that was popular in the 1960s and not after that. The main criticism of it is that it divides the interior into three distinct areas that don't communicate with each other well. FRamE is looking for it to make a comeback, in this new era where people are looking for effective designs for short term rentals. It seems perfect for that -- Owner's suite above rental suites, with the mid-level [Entry, Living-Dining-Kitchen-yard connection] shared. [And both the upper and mid-levels can easily have high vaulted ceilings.] The stairs on a tri-level are similar to switchback stairs, and although in a tri-level the two runs don't need to be next to each other, they most often are for circulation efficiency.
Another stair type frequently seen is the L-shape. Sometimes the mid-landing is at or near the halfway point; more often it is close to the bottom. This arrangement will feel better if there are at least two steps [two treads; three risers] on the lower run rather than just one. Will just need to make sure that required 6'-8" vertical clearance is met and coordinate floor opening/framing above, depending on floor to floor height. Another consideration is how the L-stair fits into the floor plan. As an example, if the stair run is 44-1/2" wide [clear; 45-1/2" framing dimension] the two 10" deep treads on the lower run will flush out with a hallway wall enclosing a 60" deep room [perfect size for bath, laundry, closets]. If you're tucking a bathroom under stairs, don't push it too far -- in at least one instance, a tub/shower under the stairs -- long part of tub parallel to stair run; shower valve and controls on the taller side -- worked out well in every detail except the shower rod and curtain were cut off by the angled ceiling under the descending stair.
There's a lot of demand these days for spaces in houses to be multi-functional. And there are a lot of ideas out there for stairs in this regard. Some of them are good ideas. A switchback stair with a widened landing, a bench and a large window [particularly one that frames an interesting view] can provide a great little away space while spilling daylight into the stair and adjacent interior. It does this without any compromise to safety and utility. Other ideas are more questionable. It doesn't seem like a good idea for a step to double as a drawer. Maybe on a sailboat? But in a house, sooner or later the drawer will be open when coming down the stairs in the middle of the night -- and stepping into the drawer rather than the next stair will cause an injury. It's not worth it. Let the stairs be stairs, and find some other way to provide extra storage.